Hi all, 2014-11-16 22:42 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hello Janusz, > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 08:29:04PM +0100, Janusz Użycki wrote: >> W dniu 2014-11-15 o 00:26, Uwe Kleine-König pisze: >> >Hello, >> > >> >On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Janusz Uzycki wrote: >> >>Function gpiod_get_direction() of gpiolib calls get_direction() >> >>callback. If chip doesn't implement it EINVAL error is returned. >> >>The function doesn't use for returned value shadowed FLAG_IS_OUT >> >>bit of gpio_desc.flags field so the callback is required. >> >This sounds like a bugfix but "required" is wrong as AFAIR this call is >> >optional and hardly used. Or did that change? The only drawback is that >> >the debug output for (by Linux) uninitialized gpios is wrong. >> >> Yes, the callback is optional but gpiod_get_direction() doesn't work >> without it. >> gpiod_get_direction() doesn't seem optional, >> Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt: >> "A driver can also query the current direction of a GPIO: >> int gpiod_get_direction(const struct gpio_desc *desc) >> This function will return either GPIOF_DIR_IN or GPIOF_DIR_OUT. >> Be aware that there is no default direction for GPIOs. Therefore, >> **using a GPIO >> without setting its direction first is illegal and will result in undefined >> behavior!**" >> There is nothing about EINVAL error. It happens despite direction was >> set before. The reason is undefined get_direction callback. > I still think you must not rely on gpiod_get_direction working. Some > controllers might not be able to provide this info and if you know that > the direction was set before, there is no need to ask the framework. > (Although I admit it might be comfortable at times.) > >> The commit f9e42397d79b6e810437ba1130b0b4b594f5e56c >> ("serial: mxs-auart: add interrupts for modem control lines") >> is based on Richard's commit ab5e4e4108ca5d8326cb6b4b3a21b096a002f68f >> ("tty/serial: at91: add interrupts for modem control lines"). >> Both patches use the condition: >> "if (gpiod && (gpiod_get_direction(gpiod) == GPIOF_DIR_IN))" > This is broken. Actually you want to loop only over the functions in > mctrl_gpios_desc that are inputs (i.e. CTS, DSR, DCD and RNG) and don't > depend on the hardware state and/or a working gpiod_get_direction. Yes, it seemed a convenient test to locate inputs in atmel_serial's probe function. But you're right, looping on a enum mctrl_gpio_idx [] = { UART_GPIO_CTS, UART_GPIO_DSR, UART_GPIO_DCD, UART_GPIO_RNG, UART_GPIO_RI }; Would better describe what is done, without using gpiod_get_direction(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html