Hi Geert-san, 2014-11-07 20:24 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Kaneko-san, > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2014-11-07 19:51 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Given we now have 4 identical copies of the above struct gpio_rcar_info, >>>>> I think it starts to make sense to create >>>>> >>>>> static struct gpio_rcar_info gpio_rcar_info_gen2 = { >>>>> .has_both_edge_trigger = true; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> and just reference that one from gpio_rcar_of_table[]. >>>>> While at it, you can do the same for R-Car Gen 1 for consistency. >>>> >>>> Is the following what you intended? >>> >>> Yes, thank you very much. >>> >>> Please add a similar struct for R-Car Gen1. >> >> I'm not sure about R-Car Gen1. >> Is it the following things? >> >> +static const struct gpio_rcar_info gpio_rcar_info_gen1 = { >> + .has_both_edge_trigger = false, >> +}; >> [...] >> }, { >> .compatible = "renesas,gpio-rcar", >> - .data = (void *)&(const struct gpio_rcar_info) { >> - .has_both_edge_trigger = false, >> - }, >> + .data = &gpio_rcar_info_gen1, >> }, { > > Yes, that looks fine to me. Many thanks! I'll update this patch. Thanks, Kaneko > > Thanks. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html