On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Benoit Parrot <bparrot@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > + >> > if (status) >> > goto fail; >> > >> > @@ -1742,6 +1757,72 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check __gpiod_get_index_optional(struct device *dev, >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__gpiod_get_index_optional); >> > >> > /** >> > + * gpiod_get_hog_index - obtain a GPIO from a multi-index GPIO hog >> > + * @dev: GPIO consumer >> > + * @idx: index of the GPIO to obtain >> > + * >> > + * This should only be used by the gpiochip_add to request/set GPIO initial >> > + * configuration. >> > + * >> > + * Return a valid GPIO descriptor, or an IS_ERR() condition in case of error. >> > + */ >> > +struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get_hog_index(struct device *dev, >> > + unsigned int idx) >> > +{ >> > + struct gpio_desc *desc = NULL; >> > + int err; >> > + unsigned long flags; >> > + const char *name; >> > + >> > + /* Using device tree? */ >> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node) >> > + desc = of_get_gpio_hog(dev->of_node, idx, &name, &flags); >> > + >> > + if (!desc) >> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP); >> > + else if (IS_ERR(desc)) >> > + return desc; >> > + >> > + dev_dbg(dev, "gpio-hog: GPIO:%d (%s) as %s%s\n", >> > + desc_to_gpio(desc), name, (flags&GPIOF_DIR_IN)?"input":"output", >> > + (flags&GPIOF_DIR_IN)?"":(flags&GPIOF_INIT_HIGH)?"/high":"/low"); >> > + >> >> ... > > I guess this means to remove the dev_dbg code? No, it was just to delimitate the code which I suggested to factorize into its own function below. :) This dev_dbg is fine IMHO. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html