On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:28:33PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Thierry Reding > > Then again, maybe rather than add a new set of functions we should bite > > the bullet and change gpiod_get() (and variants) to take an additional > > flags parameter. There aren't all that many users yet (I count 26 > > outside of drivers/gpio), so maybe now would still be a good time to do > > that. > That sounds reasonable indeed. And preferable to getting an aneurysm > after trying to spell devm_gpiod_get_index_optional_with_flags(). > This also makes the most sense since most GPIO users will want to set > a direction and value right after obtaining one. So if there is no > objection I will probably start refactoring gpiod_get() this week. Yes, please!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
