[PATCH 6/7 v2] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Right new have one irq chip running always in level mode. It would nicer
to have two irq chips where one is handling level type interrupts and
the other one is doing edge interrupts. So we can have at runtime two users
where one is using edge and the other level.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I am very sorry for the delay. I assumed that I've already fixed the
patch sent it out. Just realized that it was not the case.

v1…v2:
    - using the lopp again but breaking the assignment of type and
      handler out of the loop as suggested by delicious quinoa.

 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index 752ccb1..ca36f11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ static int dwapb_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
 		break;
 	}
 
+	irq_setup_alt_chip(d, type);
+
 	writel(level, gpio->regs + GPIO_INTTYPE_LEVEL);
 	writel(polarity, gpio->regs + GPIO_INT_POLARITY);
 	irq_gc_unlock(igc);
@@ -207,7 +209,7 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	struct irq_chip_generic	*irq_gc;
 	unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
 	struct irq_chip_type *ct;
-	int err, irq;
+	int err, irq, i;
 
 	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
 	if (!irq) {
@@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	if (!gpio->domain)
 		return;
 
-	err = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(gpio->domain, ngpio, 1,
+	err = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(gpio->domain, ngpio, 2,
 					     "gpio-dwapb", handle_level_irq,
 					     IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0,
 					     IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK);
@@ -242,17 +244,24 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	irq_gc->reg_base = gpio->regs;
 	irq_gc->private = gpio;
 
-	ct = irq_gc->chip_types;
-	ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
-	ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
-	ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
-	ct->chip.irq_set_type = dwapb_irq_set_type;
-	ct->chip.irq_enable = dwapb_irq_enable;
-	ct->chip.irq_disable = dwapb_irq_disable;
-	ct->chip.irq_request_resources = dwapb_irq_reqres;
-	ct->chip.irq_release_resources = dwapb_irq_relres;
-	ct->regs.ack = GPIO_PORTA_EOI;
-	ct->regs.mask = GPIO_INTMASK;
+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+		ct = &irq_gc->chip_types[i];
+		ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
+		ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
+		ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
+		ct->chip.irq_set_type = dwapb_irq_set_type;
+		ct->chip.irq_enable = dwapb_irq_enable;
+		ct->chip.irq_disable = dwapb_irq_disable;
+		ct->chip.irq_request_resources = dwapb_irq_reqres;
+		ct->chip.irq_release_resources = dwapb_irq_relres;
+		ct->regs.ack = GPIO_PORTA_EOI;
+		ct->regs.mask = GPIO_INTMASK;
+		ct->type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK;
+	}
+
+	irq_gc->chip_types[0].type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK;
+	irq_gc->chip_types[1].type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
+	irq_gc->chip_types[1].handler = handle_edge_irq;
 
 	irq_set_chained_handler(irq, dwapb_irq_handler);
 	irq_set_handler_data(irq, gpio);
-- 
1.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html