Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/25/2014 10:36 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> @@ -242,17 +244,28 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>  	irq_gc->reg_base = gpio->regs;
>>  	irq_gc->private = gpio;
>>  
>> -	ct = irq_gc->chip_types;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_set_type = dwapb_irq_set_type;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_enable = dwapb_irq_enable;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_disable = dwapb_irq_disable;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_request_resources = dwapb_irq_reqres;
>> -	ct->chip.irq_release_resources = dwapb_irq_relres;
>> -	ct->regs.ack = GPIO_PORTA_EOI;
>> -	ct->regs.mask = GPIO_INTMASK;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> +
>> +		ct = &irq_gc->chip_types[i];
>> +		ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_set_type = dwapb_irq_set_type;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_enable = dwapb_irq_enable;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_disable = dwapb_irq_disable;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_request_resources = dwapb_irq_reqres;
>> +		ct->chip.irq_release_resources = dwapb_irq_relres;
>> +		ct->regs.ack = GPIO_PORTA_EOI;
>> +		ct->regs.mask = GPIO_INTMASK;
>> +
>> +		if (i == 0) {
>> +			ct->type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK;
>> +			ct->handler = handle_level_irq;
>> +		} else {
>> +			ct->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
>> +			ct->handler = handle_edge_irq;
>> +		}
> 
> Sebastian,
> 
> IMHO the loop looks strange, especially with the (i == 0) check.

how so?

> How about unrolling it again and assign both chip_types independently?

If more code makes you happy so be it. I will post the series soon with
the loop unrolled.

> Sebastian

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html