On Jun 29 2016, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric and I are working towards adding support for fuse mounts in
> non-init user namespaces. Towards that end we'd like to add ACL support
> to fuse as this will allow for a cleaner implementation overall. Below
> is an initial patch to support this. I'd like to get some general
> feedback on this patch and ask a couple of specific questions.
>
> There are some indications that fuse supports ACLs on the userspace side
> when default_permissions is not used (though I'm not seeing how that
> works). Will these changes conflict with that support, and if how do we
> avoid those conflicts?
>
I think as long as the kernel interprets ACLs only if default_permission
is used, you should be fine.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
