Re: [PATCHv7 00/29] THP-enabled tmpfs/shmem using compound pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/2016 7:33 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
On 04/19/2016 12:55 AM, Shi, Yang wrote:
2. I ran my THP test (generated a program with 4MB text section) on both
x86-64 and ARM64 with yours and Hugh's patches (linux-next tree), I got
the program execution time reduced by ~12% on x86-64, it looks very
impressive.

But, on ARM64, there is just ~3% change, and sometimes huge tmpfs may
show even worse data than non-hugepage.

Both yours and Hugh's patches has the same behavior.

Any idea?

Just a shot in the dark, but what page size do you use? If you use 4k
pages, then hugepage size should be the same as on x86 and a similar

I do use 4K pages for both x86-64 and ARM64 in my testing.

Thanks,
Yang

behavior could be expected. Otherwise, hugepages would be too big to be
taken advantage of by your test program.

Jerome


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux