Re: [PATCHv7 00/29] THP-enabled tmpfs/shmem using compound pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/19/2016 12:55 AM, Shi, Yang wrote:
> 2. I ran my THP test (generated a program with 4MB text section) on both
> x86-64 and ARM64 with yours and Hugh's patches (linux-next tree), I got
> the program execution time reduced by ~12% on x86-64, it looks very
> impressive.
> 
> But, on ARM64, there is just ~3% change, and sometimes huge tmpfs may
> show even worse data than non-hugepage.
> 
> Both yours and Hugh's patches has the same behavior.
> 
> Any idea?

Just a shot in the dark, but what page size do you use? If you use 4k
pages, then hugepage size should be the same as on x86 and a similar
behavior could be expected. Otherwise, hugepages would be too big to be
taken advantage of by your test program.

Jerome

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux