Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND] Huge Page Futures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:28:33AM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 01/28/2016 07:05 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> >> In a search of the archives, it appears huge page support in one form or
> >> another has been a discussion topic in almost every LSF/MM gathering. Based
> >> on patches submitted this past year, huge pages is still an area of active
> >> development.  And, it appears this level of activity will  continue in the
> >> coming year.
> >>
> >> I propose a "Huge Page Futures" session to discuss large works in progress
> >> as well as work people are considering for 2016.  Areas of discussion would
> >> minimally include:
> >>
> >> - Krill Shutemov's THP new refcounting code and the push for huge page
> >>   support in the page cache.
> > 
> > I am also interested in this discussion. We had some nice challenge
> > w.r.t to powerpc implementation of THP.
> > 
> >>
> >> - Matt Wilcox's huge page support in DAX enabled filesystems, but perhaps
> >>   more interesting is the desire for supporting PUD pages.  This seems to
> >>   beg the question of supporting transparent PUD pages elsewhere.
> >>
> > 
> > I am also looking at switching powerpc hugetlbfs to GENERAL_HUGETLB. To
> > support 16GB pages I would need hugepage at PUD/PGD. Can you elaborate
> > why supporting huge PUD page is a challenge ?
> 
> For hugetlbfs it should not be an issue.  However, page fault handling for
> hugetlbfs is already a special case today.  Is that what you were asking?
> 
> Matt's work adds THP for PUD sized huge pages to DAX mappings.  The thought
> that popped into my head is "Does it make sense to try and expand THP for
> PUD sized pages elsewhere?".  Perhaps that is nonsense and a silly question
> to ask.

I don't think it has much sense on x86-64. But if an architecture has more
reasonable page size on PUD level, who knows...

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux