On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Just to make sure - that does include 13/13, presumably? Ugh, no, I had set that aside and then forgot all about it. I'm not sure about 13/13. I'm ok with it, but I'm not sure it's any less confusing than the cookie was. I like how it removes "put_link()" as a callback, but at the same time I think it's even more abstract than the cookie was. The main worry I have is that the naming is generic, but there's only a single very specialized use for it. Do we expect other uses? Because if not, I think it would be clearer if it was named to be more concretely about putlink, and avoid the fact that it feels very abstract. Don't get me wrong - abstract generalized helper functions are cool. But people aren't very abstract, and it tends to make for confusing code when you aren't intimately familiar with the rules. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html