On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> needed, remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree
Thanks
Boaz
> ---
> fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
> struct inode *inode;
> int err;
>
> - if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
> err = PTR_ERR(inode);
> if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
