On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:20:32PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so new_valid_dev check is not
> > needed, remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/ubifs/dir.c | 3 ---
> > fs/ubifs/misc.h | 9 ++-------
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> > index 5c27c66..1dd9267 100644
> > --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> > @@ -787,9 +787,6 @@ static int ubifs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> >
> > dbg_gen("dent '%pd' in dir ino %lu", dentry, dir->i_ino);
> >
> > - if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > if (S_ISBLK(mode) || S_ISCHR(mode)) {
> > dev = kmalloc(sizeof(union ubifs_dev_desc), GFP_NOFS);
> > if (!dev)
> > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/misc.h b/fs/ubifs/misc.h
> > index ee7cb5e..0197ed6 100644
> > --- a/fs/ubifs/misc.h
> > +++ b/fs/ubifs/misc.h
> > @@ -155,13 +155,8 @@ static inline int ubifs_wbuf_sync(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
> > */
> > static inline int ubifs_encode_dev(union ubifs_dev_desc *dev, dev_t rdev)
> > {
> > - if (new_valid_dev(rdev)) {
> > - dev->new = cpu_to_le32(new_encode_dev(rdev));
> > - return sizeof(dev->new);
> > - } else {
> > - dev->huge = cpu_to_le64(huge_encode_dev(rdev));
> > - return sizeof(dev->huge);
> > - }
> > + dev->huge = cpu_to_le64(huge_encode_dev(rdev));
> > + return sizeof(dev->huge);
>
> Please be careful.
>
> dev->new = cpu_to_le32(new_encode_dev(rdev));
> return sizeof(dev->huge);
>
> ...is the correct branch. You enabled the dead one.
Sorry about that, will resend fixing it. Thanks.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
