2015-09-23 16:03 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:19PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> +static int
>> +richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
>> +{
>> + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl;
>> + unsigned int x = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
>> + unsigned int other_mask = acl->a_other_mask & ~x;
>> + struct richace *ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1;
>> +
>> + if (!(other_mask &&
>> + (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) &&
>> + (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED)))
>> + return 0;
>
> By the way, I think this is only called after checking MASKED--so the
> MASKED check here could be a WARN_ON, or could just be dropped. Ditto
> for the following patch.
Hmm, yes. I'll drop that.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
