On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:58:04AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 11:32 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:30:21PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> >> The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
> >> have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should be generally useful to
> >> have an in-kernel copy to avoid lots of switches between kernel and user
> >> space.
> >>
> >> I make this configurable by adding two new flags. Users who only want a
> >> reflink can pass COPY_FR_REFLINK, and users who want a full data copy can
> >> pass COPY_FR_COPY. The default (flags=0) means to first attempt a
> >> reflink, but use the pagecache if that fails.
> >>
> >> I moved the rw_verify_area() calls into the fallback code since some
> >> filesystems can handle reflinking a large range.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> - Rename COPY_REFLINK -> COPY_FR_REFLINK
> >> - Introduce COPY_FR_COPY flag
> >> - Flags == 0 is really COPY_FR_COPY|COPY_FR_REFLINK
> >> - Drop check for invalid flags
> >> - Move call to do_splice_direct() into a new function
> >> - Move rw_verify_area() checks into the new fallback function
> >> ---
> >> fs/read_write.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >> include/linux/copy.h | 6 +++++
> >> include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 +
> >> include/uapi/linux/copy.h | 7 ++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 include/linux/copy.h
> >> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/copy.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> >> index 363bd3e..ba24884 100644
> >> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> >> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/slab.h>
> >> #include <linux/stat.h>
> >> #include <linux/fcntl.h>
> >> +#include <linux/copy.h>
> >> #include <linux/file.h>
> >> #include <linux/uio.h>
> >> #include <linux/fsnotify.h>
> >> @@ -1329,6 +1330,29 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sendfile64, int, out_fd, int, in_fd,
> >> }
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> +static ssize_t vfs_copy_file_pagecache(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >> + size_t len)
> >> +{
> >> + ssize_t ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file_in, &pos_in, len);
> >> + if (ret >= 0) {
> >> + len = ret;
> >> + ret = rw_verify_area(WRITE, file_out, &pos_out, len);
> >> + if (ret >= 0)
> >> + len = ret;
> >> + }
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + file_start_write(file_out);
> >> + ret = do_splice_direct(file_in, &pos_in, file_out, &pos_out, len, 0);
> >> + file_end_write(file_out);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * copy_file_range() differs from regular file read and write in that it
> >> * specifically allows return partial success. When it does so is up to
> >> @@ -1338,34 +1362,17 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >> size_t len, int flags)
> >> {
> >> - struct inode *inode_in;
> >> - struct inode *inode_out;
> >> ssize_t ret;
> >>
> >> - if (flags)
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> - /* copy_file_range allows full ssize_t len, ignoring MAX_RW_COUNT */
> >> - ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file_in, &pos_in, len);
> >> - if (ret >= 0)
> >> - ret = rw_verify_area(WRITE, file_out, &pos_out, len);
> >> - if (ret < 0)
> >> - return ret;
> >> + if (flags == 0)
> >> + flags = COPY_FR_COPY | COPY_FR_REFLINK;
> >
> > This function must return -EINVAL if any of the undefined flags bits are
> > set.
>
> Sure, I'll add that.
>
> >
> >>
> >> if (!(file_in->f_mode & FMODE_READ) ||
> >> !(file_out->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) ||
> >> (file_out->f_flags & O_APPEND) ||
> >> - !file_out->f_op || !file_out->f_op->copy_file_range)
> >> + !file_in->f_op)
> >> return -EBADF;
> >>
> >> - inode_in = file_inode(file_in);
> >> - inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> >> -
> >> - /* make sure offsets don't wrap and the input is inside i_size */
> >> - if (pos_in + len < pos_in || pos_out + len < pos_out ||
> >> - pos_in + len > i_size_read(inode_in))
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> if (len == 0)
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> @@ -1373,8 +1380,13 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> - ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out,
> >> - len, flags);
> >> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> + if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range)
> >> + ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> >> + pos_out, len, flags);
> >> + if ((ret < 0) && (flags & COPY_FR_COPY))
> >> + ret = vfs_copy_file_pagecache(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> >> + pos_out, len);
> >> if (ret > 0) {
> >> fsnotify_access(file_in);
> >> add_rchar(current, ret);
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/copy.h b/include/linux/copy.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..fd54543
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/linux/copy.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> >> +#ifndef _LINUX_COPY_H
> >> +#define _LINUX_COPY_H
> >> +
> >> +#include <uapi/linux/copy.h>
> >> +
> >> +#endif /* _LINUX_COPY_H */
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/Kbuild b/include/uapi/linux/Kbuild
> >> index 70ff1d9..d46830a 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/Kbuild
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/Kbuild
> >> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ header-y += coda_psdev.h
> >> header-y += coff.h
> >> header-y += connector.h
> >> header-y += const.h
> >> +header-y += copy.h
> >> header-y += cramfs_fs.h
> >> header-y += cuda.h
> >> header-y += cyclades.h
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/copy.h b/include/uapi/linux/copy.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..2da59a8
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/copy.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> >> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_COPY_H
> >> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_COPY_H
> >> +
> >> +#define COPY_FR_COPY (1 << 0) /* Only do a pagecache copy. */
> >> +#define COPY_FR_REFLINK (1 << 1) /* Only make a reflink. */
> >
> > Could I have a COPY_FR_DEDUPE flag too, please?
> >
> > (I don't mind adding it myself when I get around to hooking up XFS, but I
> > was hoping to get it in during the first round).
>
> I guess I can, but only iff everybody has agreed on using copy for dedupes
> instead of somethink like fallocate.
I don't see how fallocate could even handle userspace-directed deduplication
since the dedupe operation compares two file ranges and reflinks them if the
contents match whereas fallocate only operates on a single file range.
A single file range would work if userspace was telling the kernel to start a
lengthy search for all duplicates of a particular file's range, but ...
yuck.
(Granted, the btrfs extent_same ioctl lets userspace call dedupe on multiple
files simultaneously, but that's for another day.)
--D
>
> Anna
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> >> +
> >> +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_COPY_H */
> >> --
> >> 2.5.1
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
