Hello, Jan. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:08:47PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Inode may contain writeback pages (but not dirty pages) without being on > any of the dirty lists. That is correct. Josef Bacik had patches to create Hmmm... Can you please expand on how / why that happens? It's kinda weird to require writeback to walk all inodes regardless of their dirty states. > a list to track inodes with pages under writeback but they clashed with > your patch series and they didn't get rebased yet AFAIR. Wouldn't it make more sense to simply put them on one of the existing b_* lists? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
