On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:11:23AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Eryu, can you change the way you run the event trace to be: > > $ sudo trace-cmd <options> -o <outfile location> ./check <test options> > > rather than running the trace as a background operation elsewhere? > Maybe that will give better results. The results are here http://128.199.137.77/writeback-v3/ > > Also, it would be informative to us if you can reproduce this with a > v5 filesystem (i.e. mkfs.xfs -m crc=1) because it has much better > on-disk information for sequence-of-event triage like this. If you > can reproduce it with a v5 filesystem, can you post the trace and > metadump? This seems to be harder to reproduce with tracepoints enabled, but I'll keep trying, and the tests below. Thanks, Eryu > > Other things to check (separately): > > - change godown to godown -f > - add a "sleep 5" before running godown after sync > - add a "sleep 5; sync" before running godown > > i.e. I'm wondering if sync is not waiting for everything, and so we > aren't capturing the IO completions because the filesystem is > already shut down by the time they are delivered... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
