On Friday, July 31, 2015 5:00:43 PM PDT, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Note: Hirofumi's email is clear, logical and speaks to the question. This branch of the thread is largely pointless, though it essentially says the same thing in non-technical terms. Perhaps your next response should be to Hirofumi, and perhaps it should be technical.
Now, let me try to lead the way, but being specific. RDMA was raised as a potential failure case for Tux3 page forking. But the RDMA api does not let you use memory mmaped by Tux3 as a source or destination of IO. Instead, it sets up its own pages and hands them out to the RDMA app from a pool. So no issue. One down, right? Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html