Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 May 2015, Daniel Phillips wrote:

On Monday, May 25, 2015 9:25:44 PM PDT, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 05/21/2015 03:53 PM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:51:46 PM PDT, David Lang wrote:
how do you prevent it from continuing to interact with the old version
of the page and never see updates or have it's changes reflected on
the current page?

Why would it do that, and what would be surprising about it? Did
you have a specific case in mind?

After a get_page(), page_cache_get(), or other equivalent
function, a piece of code has the expectation that it can
continue using that page until after it has released the
reference count.

This can be an arbitrarily long period of time.

It is perfectly welcome to keep using that page as long as it
wants, Tux3 does not care. When it lets go of the last reference
(and Tux3 has finished with it) then the page is freeable. Did
you have a more specific example where this would be an issue?
Are you talking about kernel or userspace code?

if the page gets modified again, will that cause any issues? what if the page gets modified before the copy gets written out, so that there are two dirty copies of the page in the process of being written?

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux