On 06/26/2015 04:19 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 15:52 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
Yes, it's only used in util-linux now. But do you think it's weird
that:
-o atime - no atime (we treat it as the default behavior)
-o noatime - no atime
Yes, it is, and worse, this is inconsistent with other file-systems,
e.g., ext4. So I think I am convinced that with UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
we'll end up with a better overall result.
Great!! Then I will plan to do it later.
Thanx for you patience on this proposal :).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
