On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 11:16 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Therefore, I introduced a new option named as force_atime in ubifs. > That's a ubifs-dependent opiton and it works as a main switch, in > a higher level compared with atime and noatime. If force_atime, we > support the atime-related flags. Otherwise, we don't care about all of > them in flags and don't support atime anyway. How bad is it to just default to relatime like other file-systems do, comparing to what we have now? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
