Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kenton Varda <kenton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:47:32 +0200
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxx>, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux API <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Containers <containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAOP=4wieEaR_wESNyba7EKPAhi6kf+ujxhoMAFKVRozqWtXHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0

Am 28.05.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Kenton Varda:
> We never mount sysfs in Sandstorm.

sysfs is ABI and applications depend on it.
Even glibc is using sysfs. Currently it has
fallback paths but these may go away...

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Kenton Varda

References:
- [CFT][PATCH 0/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Serge Hallyn
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Kenton Varda
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
  - From: Kenton Varda

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC v3 36/45] NFSv4: Fix GETATTR bitmap verification
Next by Date: Re: [RFC v3 36/45] NFSv4: Fix GETATTR bitmap verification
Previous by thread: Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
Next by thread: Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]