Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Andy Lutomirski (luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I had hoped to get some Tested-By's on that patch series.
> 
> Sorry, I've been totally swamped.
> 
> I suspect that Sandstorm is okay, but I haven't had a chance to test
> it for real.  Sandstorm makes only limited use of proc and sysfs in
> containers, but I'll see if I can test it for real this weekend.

Testing this with unprivileged containers, I get

lxc-start: conf.c: lxc_mount_auto_mounts: 808 Operation not permitted - error mounting sysfs on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/sys/devices/virtual/net flags 0

> > Oh well.  The fundamentals seem sound, and my biggest concern the
> > implicit nodev does not apply so I will put this patchset in linux-next
> > and aim at merging it in the next merge window.  Hopefully that will
> > leave enough time catch problems.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andy Lutomirski
> AMA Capital Management, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux