Re: Repercussions of overflow in get_next_ino()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Nikolay Borisov:
> My question is what are the repercussions of get_next_ino overflowing 
> and at some point having possibly multiple inodes on my system with the 
> same i_ino id? And why is it safe to have the inode id's overflow and 
> wrap around?

I am afraid some applications won't work correctly.
As far as I know, ls(1) and find(1) don't show the file whose inum is
zero.

See also
	Subject: [PATCH v2] vfs: get_next_ino(), never inum=0
	Date: 2014-05-28 14:06:32
	http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=140128600801771&w=2
and their thread.

For tmpfs, I have another patch. Just FYI, here attached.


J. R. Okajima

Attachment: a.patch.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux