Repercussions of overflow in get_next_ino()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

get_next_ino would allocate a number between 0...2^32 - 1 to be used as an inode number. The implementation of this mechanism relies on an unsigned int which is 32 bits. On one server I'm observing that every couple of months grsec complains that the percpu variable last_ino overflows (due to shared_last_ino) being incremented to the limit of a 32 bit value and then then the machine becomes unstable due to grsec starting to kill processes. Now, I understand this isssue stems from the fact how grsec detects the overflow.

My question is what are the repercussions of get_next_ino overflowing and at some point having possibly multiple inodes on my system with the same i_ino id? And why is it safe to have the inode id's overflow and wrap around?

Would simply changing the inode numbering code work with 64 bit value remedy the situation or would it require a more involved fix?

Regards,
Nikolay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux