Re: [git pull] more vfs bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Umm...  Works for me.  Let's do it this way, then:
>         * rename those guys through the whole series
>         * leave the "annotate the filesystems" bits to sit in a vfs.git
> branch
>         * slap trylock_super() + bugfixes I'd been doing today
> (procfs and debugfs symlink removals racing with follow_link, oopsable;
> double-copy in autofs dev_ioctl.c, with length not rechecked after
> copying, theoretically oopsable + reasonably likely data leak) on top of queue
>         * feed it through local tests and send an updated pull request later
> tonight.

Ok, I guess I can live with that.

                       Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux