On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 06:19:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > dentry_inode -> something. d_opened_inode() might do, but I'm not sure - > > still sounds a bit wrong to me. What it's about is "the actual fs object > > behind this name, maybe from upper fs, maybe showing through from underlying > > layer" > > Yeah, I think "d_backing_store_inode()" would probably be more along > the lines, but that's a mouthful. Maybe shortened to > "d_backing_inode()"? Umm... Works for me. Let's do it this way, then: * rename those guys through the whole series * leave the "annotate the filesystems" bits to sit in a vfs.git branch * slap trylock_super() + bugfixes I'd been doing today (procfs and debugfs symlink removals racing with follow_link, oopsable; double-copy in autofs dev_ioctl.c, with length not rechecked after copying, theoretically oopsable + reasonably likely data leak) on top of queue * feed it through local tests and send an updated pull request later tonight. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
