Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:30:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:52:32PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Who can give us ACKs on these last five fs/xfs patches?  (And is it
> > going to cause trouble if they go in through the nfsd tree?)
> 
> 
> We'd need ACKs from Dave.  He already has pulled in two patches so
> we might run into some conflicts.  Maybe the best idea is to add the
> exportfs patch to both the XFS and nfsd trees, so each of them can
> pull in the rest?  Or we could commit the two XFS preparation patches
> to both tree and get something that compiles and works in the nfsd
> tree.

This patch has already been committed to the XFS repo.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux