Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:52:32PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Who can give us ACKs on these last five fs/xfs patches?  (And is it
> going to cause trouble if they go in through the nfsd tree?)


We'd need ACKs from Dave.  He already has pulled in two patches so
we might run into some conflicts.  Maybe the best idea is to add the
exportfs patch to both the XFS and nfsd trees, so each of them can
pull in the rest?  Or we could commit the two XFS preparation patches
to both tree and get something that compiles and works in the nfsd
tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux