In dca692880e887739a669f6c41a80ca68ce2b09fc I see that ".direct_IO = cifs_direct_io" is added only to "cifs_addr_ops" but not to "cifs_addr_ops_smallbuf". Presuming that the only difference between the two structs is the size of the buffer they operate on (judging by the name), shouldn't ".direct_IO = cifs_direct_io" be added to "cifs_addr_ops_smallbuf" as well? In a test environment an open(2) using O_DIRECT didn't work (vers=3.0) but when I added ".direct_IO = cifs_direct_io" to "cifs_addr_ops_smallbuf" it worked. -- Thanos Makatos-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
