Re: Intentionally corrupted vfat fs causing BUG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 13.10.2014 um 10:59 schrieb OGAWA Hirofumi:
>> The question is how long these limits will stay...
>> User namespaces uncovered already a pile of issues wrt. to mounting.
> 
> Well, anyway, I don't object like that simple patch.
> 
> My worry is, I feel we need something like online-fsck finally if we
> tackled fully to avoid issues (I still didn't analyze about this issue
> seriously and fully), and measurable overheads.
> 
> And I myself have interest to online/runtime-fsck (i.e. detect and fix)
> though, I don't have interest to make it generic operations, and I would
> not have interest to tackle for all FSes...

At the end of the day we have to treat every filesystem provided by the user as
user input and must not trust it.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux