Re: The VFS hot tracking debacle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014, 19:35:53 schrieb Daniel Poelzleithner:
> Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Ping ^ 7
> 
> I'm following this patch now for quite some time and I have to say that this
> thread+patch is one of the most disappointing experiences I had with kernel
> development.
> 
> I can't understand why such a patch is simply ignored from the maintainers
> of the subsystem, no comment, no review, no checkin.

I always wanted to try this one out, but never got around doing it.

I really like the general approach of it to put the general stuff into VFS and 
only the special stuff into filesystems like BTRFS.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux