On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:10:52AM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > That makes sense, because the patches to transform our workarounds > into shiny new kernel hooks are still in progress, as I said. I would > appreciate the courtesy of being permitted to take the time to do the > work to the necessary quality without being subjected to endless > carping about when the patches will be posted. The feedback which you have been getting, fairly consistently I believe, is that it is the shiny new kernel hooks that need to be reviewed, not the workarounds. I don't think it's a matter of people not being willing to give you the time to do this work (take all the time you need!); but rather that it's premature for you to be asking for tux3 to be merged before those patches have been posted and reviewed and found to be shiny. Best regards, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
