On 22 May 2014 15:13, Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 14:48 +0200, Sergei Antonov wrote: > > [snip] >> fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h >> index 3c872b2..f917fe4 100644 >> --- a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h >> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h >> @@ -369,129 +369,139 @@ typedef int (*search_strategy_t)(struct hfs_bnode *, >> /* attributes.c */ >> int __init hfsplus_create_attr_tree_cache(void); >> void hfsplus_destroy_attr_tree_cache(void); >> +int hfsplus_attr_bin_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *k1, >> + const hfsplus_btree_key *k2); >> +int hfsplus_attr_build_key(struct super_block *sb, hfsplus_btree_key *key, >> + u32 cnid, const char *name); >> +void hfsplus_attr_build_key_uni(hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 cnid, >> + struct hfsplus_attr_unistr *name); > > As I remember, this function was deleted recently. Could you check it? This function exists in the Linus's tree. Should I have done a patch against linux-next? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
