Re: inotify/sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ... except when that workstation has e.g. /var/spool/mail NFS-mounted, with
> MTA running on server.  Or "wait until the job on server puts its results
> into this file".  And yes, I've seen requests along those lines ;-/
> Cluster filesystems have the same issue...

None of that matters.

A good file manager uses fsnotify to get efficient and timely local
notifications, and also does polling to check by hand - much less
timely, but covers the remote case.

The point is, fsnotify is very much a valid thing to do even on
networked filesystems, and even if you don't get full coverage.

The fact that people then *also* may use it incorrectly and think that
it is sufficient *without* the polling, that's not our problem. The
fact that stupid uses exist is not a reason to disable something that
_can_ be used intelligently.

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux