On 28 March 2014 16:09, Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 14:42 +0100, Sergei Antonov wrote: > >> > >> > I have such principal points: >> > (1) On-disk layout declarations should live in peace with Technical Note >> > TN1150; >> > (2) Journal replay should be transaction based. >> >> Could you clarify "transaction based"? Seriously. Because since there >> are transactions in HFS+ journal, all replay implementations are >> transaction-based in a way. > > I suppose that I described my vision very clearly in previous e-mails. > Sorry, I don't see any necessity to repeat the same things. > > If you want to ask something, please, ask concrete question. Because, > from my point of view, we had deep discussion earlier. And our > discussion hasn't goal to elaborate theoretical principles of > transaction approach. So, your current question is not concrete for me. > > If you want to suggest something, please, do it. But, please, suggest > something new and don't suggest the same things. > > Thanks, > Vyacheslav Dubeyko. My concrete question is what is your definition of the term? A definition, you know, an unambiguous piece of text describing the term. Of course you wrote about it before. Let's state (if not reconcile) our disagreements on the issue in this thread. Of the two principal points you mentioned, one is clear to me, the other is a little too vaguely formulated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
