Re: A few thoughts on hfsplus dev (Re: [PATCH v2] hfsplus: add journal replay)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 14:42 +0100, Sergei Antonov wrote:

> >
> > I have such principal points:
> > (1) On-disk layout declarations should live in peace with Technical Note
> > TN1150;
> > (2) Journal replay should be transaction based.
> 
> Could you clarify "transaction based"? Seriously. Because since there
> are transactions in HFS+ journal, all replay implementations are
> transaction-based in a way.

I suppose that I described my vision very clearly in previous e-mails.
Sorry, I don't see any necessity to repeat the same things.

If you want to ask something, please, ask concrete question. Because,
from my point of view, we had deep discussion earlier. And our
discussion hasn't goal to elaborate theoretical principles of
transaction approach. So, your current question is not concrete for me.

If you want to suggest something, please, do it. But, please, suggest
something new and don't suggest the same things.

Thanks,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux