A leftover lock on the list is surely a sign of a problem of some sort,
but it's not necessarily a reason to panic the box. Instead, just log a
warning with some info about the lock, and then delete it like we would
any other lock.
In the event that the filesystem declares a ->lock f_op, we may end up
leaking something, but that's generally preferable to an immediate
panic.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/locks.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 6084f5a32e9c..dd309333afc9 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2281,16 +2281,28 @@ void locks_remove_flock(struct file *filp)
while ((fl = *before) != NULL) {
if (fl->fl_file == filp) {
- if (IS_FLOCK(fl)) {
- locks_delete_lock(before);
- continue;
- }
if (IS_LEASE(fl)) {
lease_modify(before, F_UNLCK);
continue;
}
- /* What? */
- BUG();
+
+ /*
+ * There's a leftover lock on the list of a type that
+ * we didn't expect to see. Most likely a classic
+ * POSIX lock that ended up not getting released
+ * properly, or that raced onto the list somehow. Log
+ * some info about it and then just remove it from
+ * the list.
+ */
+ WARN(!IS_FLOCK(fl),
+ "leftover lock: dev=%u:%u ino=%lu type=%hhd flags=0x%x start=%lld end=%lld\n",
+ MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
+ MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), inode->i_ino,
+ fl->fl_type, fl->fl_flags,
+ fl->fl_start, fl->fl_end);
+
+ locks_delete_lock(before);
+ continue;
}
before = &fl->fl_next;
}
--
1.8.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
