> My plan is to eventually submit this to become part of the POSIX > standard though they won't take it until there's at least one shipping > implementation. I assume that we just need to stick that inside of > __USE_GNU for now, and if POSIX eventually picks it up then we'll just > remove that protection? Change it as appropriate, yes. > Why does glibc have its own definitions for the fcntl F_* cmd values > instead of using the ones in the uapi kernel headers? Would it not be > simpler to just have the fcntl.h include those instead of duplicating > them? libc headers respect ISO C and POSIX name space constraints. Kernel headers (even uapi ones) fail to. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
