Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:20:14AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Have you been over the patchset?  Looks sane to you?

I looked over it, although I didn't dig into the details of all driver
patches, and I like what I see.  As said in the previous mail I'd love
to see the patches to shrink struct bio again, too.

> Given how disruptive this patchset is to the block layer I'm wondering
> how painful this change will be in combination with Jens' blk-mq
> changes.  I'd prefer to see blk-mq before immutable biovecs; but I have
> my own selfish reasons for that.

I don't see too much conflicts with blk-multiqueue as that is operating
at the request layer.  Blk-multiqueue defintively is a higher priority
for me, but as it already looks fairly good I have no idea what we're
blocked on for it anyway.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux