Just curious, what's the state of the remaining immutable bio work? On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 02:15:29PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > What is preventing you from sending those out as well? While it's not > > absolutely nessecary it would certainly be good if we'd avoid a struct > > bio size regression. > > There's still some fairly significant changes, and I don't want to make > too many invasive changes at once. > > Main thing is making generic_make_request() take arbitrary size bios. > After this series that's just two simple patches, but then the changes > to make use of that will be changing behaviour in non obvious ways. > > The way the merging changes work is it enables multi page bvecs - so a > bvec can point to many physically contiguous pages. This moves segment > merging to bio_add_page(), and gets rid of bi_phys_segments - now > bi_vcnt == bi_phys_segments, we just split the bio if it's too big. > > Then, with bio_add_page() building up large bios and the block layer > splitting them as necessary, there shouldn't be any need for segment > merging across bios anymore (because generally when that would've > happened before, now we'd just be sending one larger bio down). > > The remaining patches aren't terribly complicated though (less > complicated than this patch series). Trickiest bit is multipage bvecs, > and that's mostly just lots of code auditing - the way I convert > existing code is by adding bio_for_each_page() - analagous to > bio_for_each_segment, but giving you bvecs that point to single pages. > So it's an easy conversion, just have to make sure nothing's missed. ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
