Re: [PATCH 02/11] 9p: fix dentry leak in v9fs_vfs_atomic_open_dotl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:02:41PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> 
> > > I would definitely prefer EEXIST logics dealt with in fs/namei.c - if nothing
> > > else, it had been done wrong in too many instances...
> > 
> > Okay.
> 
> OK, so I'm taking 1, 5, 9, 10, 11, then add check to fs/namei.c:atomic_open(),
> leaving the rest of gfs2 ones for gfs2 tree...  Give me a few and I'll push
> that.

Pushed (head at d332c7).  That should cover 9p and fuse as well, AFAICS.
Do you have any problems with that variant?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux