On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:51:56PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> >> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> commit b6f4bee02f "fs/9p: Fix atomic_open" fixed the O_EXCL behavior, but >> >> results in a dentry leak if v9fs_vfs_lookup() returns non-NULL. >> > >> > Frankly, I would prefer to deal with that in fs/namei.c:atomic_open() >> > instead. I.e. let it call finish_no_open() as it used to do and >> > turn >> > if (create_error && dentry->d_inode == NULL) { >> > error = create_error; >> > goto out; >> > } >> > in fs/namei.c:atomic_open() into >> > if (!dentry->d_inode) { >> > if (create_error) { >> > error = create_error; >> > goto out; >> > } >> > } else if ((open_flag & (O_CREAT | O_EXCL)) == (O_CREAT | O_EXCL)) { >> > error = -EEXIST; >> > goto out; >> > } >> > >> > rather than try to deal with that crap in each instance of ->atomic_open()... >> > Objections? >> >> ->atomic_open() could be any one of >> >> lookup >> lookup+create >> lookup+create+open >> >> If it's the second one then the above is wrong. Sure, we could check >> FILE_CREATED as well, and if file wasn't created yet dentry is >> positive then we return EEXIST. But for that to be correct we need >> the last patch in the series, preventing FILE_CREATED from being set >> unconditionally. > > You mean, lookup + create + return finish_no_open()? Does anything actually > do that? Fuse does. > I agree that we want your "deal with setting FILE_CREATED in > filesystems", BTW, and I'm fine with putting it in front of the rest of > the queue. > > I would definitely prefer EEXIST logics dealt with in fs/namei.c - if nothing > else, it had been done wrong in too many instances... Okay. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html