Il 07/09/2013 17:08, Al Viro ha scritto:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:23:42AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:+static int pram_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) +{ + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; + struct pram_inode *pi; + int err = -ENOTEMPTY; + + if (!inode) + return -ENOENT; + + pi = pram_get_inode(dir->i_sb, inode->i_ino); + + /* directory to delete is empty? */ + if (pi->i_type.dir.tail == 0) { + inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime; + inode->i_size = 0; + clear_nlink(inode); + pram_write_inode(inode, NULL); + pram_dec_count(dir); + err = 0; + } else { + pram_dbg("dir not empty\n"); + } + + return err; +}... and here you are paying for delayed removal of entries: mkdir foo touch foo/bar rm -rf foo <foo/bar will fail, since opened-and-unlinked file in effect keeps the directory where it used to be "not empty" from your rmdir (and rename) POV.
Yep. Same problem as before. I think I can move the remove link into pram_dec_count and I have to modify the evict path, it should be easy to manage.
Thanks for your comments Al!!!! Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
