Re: [PATCH 09/19] pramfs: inode operations for dirs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:23:42AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:

> +static int pram_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> +	struct pram_inode *pi;
> +	int err = -ENOTEMPTY;
> +
> +	if (!inode)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	pi = pram_get_inode(dir->i_sb, inode->i_ino);
> +
> +	/* directory to delete is empty? */
> +	if (pi->i_type.dir.tail == 0) {
> +		inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
> +		inode->i_size = 0;
> +		clear_nlink(inode);
> +		pram_write_inode(inode, NULL);
> +		pram_dec_count(dir);
> +		err = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		pram_dbg("dir not empty\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

... and here you are paying for delayed removal of entries:
	mkdir foo
	touch foo/bar
	rm -rf foo <foo/bar
will fail, since opened-and-unlinked file in effect keeps the directory
where it used to be "not empty" from your rmdir (and rename) POV.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux