Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > After running this for a day on some loaded machines I ran into what > looks like an old issue with the new code. I remember you saw an issue > that manifested it self in a similar way a while back. > > [13837253.462779] FS-Cache: Assertion failed > [13837253.462782] 3 == 5 is false > [13837253.462807] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [13837253.462811] kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:414! Bah. I forgot to call fscache_op_complete(). Patch updated and repushed. Btw, I've reordered the patches to put the CIFS patch last. Can you merge the patches prior to the CIFS commit from my branch rather than cherry picking them so that if they go via two different routes, GIT will handle the merge correctly? I've stuck a tag on it (fscache-fixes-for-ceph) to make that easier for you. I've also asked another RH engineer to try doing some basic testing on the CIFS stuff - which may validate the fscache_readpages_cancel patch. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
