On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02:52:20PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> So yes it does look like the case that except for the first iteration
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> the test at the top of the while loop is now redundant, because of the
> if (!q) break; that I added.
Ah... I see the confusion now.
The test is redundant on the first iteration as well. The test is
entirely redundant. That's the point.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
