Dear Mr. Richard Weinberger:
Thank you very much for the reminder and the prove again that a profound
discussion seems not to be possible. Even more important is the point
that the discussion related with the ReiserFS was different than this
discussion, because this time I have not presented the LogHashFS to the
open source community, but another person has taken copyright
descriptions from my websites and wanted to make it an open source
project and this even by the support of another company, which by the
way has its very own business strategy.
Now, other and I have heard what we wanted: In the moment you have no
more arguments you become offensive and begin to mob and to intirigue.
Besides this, ReiserFS is virtually dead .... Furthermore, that
journalist from the Linux Magazin said it due to other political and
economical reasons in the B.R.D. as well and most potentially did never
something that is important for the open source community. Sooner or
later he will get a letter from my attorney for this offensive with the
demand to beg for pardon publicly in the ReiserFS and Tux3 mailing lists.
Said this, I will not sent any e-mails to this Chuck Nonsense thread
anymore. It was a mistake at all to try it again.
Sincerely
Christian Stroetmann
Let's do the same as in 2009[1] and finish this thread.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/reiserfs-devel/msg01543.html
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
