Re: Bit-level consistency between two ext3 filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-05-15, at 5:50, Eitan Rosenfeld <eitan27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am working on improving the resiliency of a storage system using ext3.
> 
> I will maintain two ext3 partitions of identical size on two different machines.

Why not use e.g. DRBD or MD RAID1 with iSCSI targets on the remote nodes?

> If each partition stores the same files, what are the sources of
> bit-level inconsistencies between the two partitions?  Is there any
> nondeterminism?
> 
> For example, between two otherwise identical partitions, the HTREE
> hash seeds are different in the superblock. How might this impact the
> downstream bits in the partitions?

The hashing order will be completely different, so this will produce a completely different directory order. 

In ext4, the checksums also depend on the UUID, so these would also be different for each filesystem. 

Cheers, Andreas

> You can assume that all files will be saved in the same order, and all
> timestamps and stat output are identical between files.
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> Eitan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux