Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:35 AM, james northrup
<northrup.james@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds
> that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific
> misconduct, not error

Could you please be specific about the meaning you intend? Because
innuendo is less than useful in this forum. If you mean to say that
our posted results might not be independently verifiable then I invite
you to run the tests as described (including removing fsync) yourself.
If you require any assistance from us in doing that, we will be
pleased to provide it.

Regards,

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux